05.14.08
Is Candor Best
In today’s show, adapted from an article published on the Oscar Web site written by Margaret Grundy, we look at be the research of Richard Handler, UVa professor of anthropology, and how the popularized story of colonial Williamsburg, upon reexamination reveals different side of tale.
When Americans visit Colonial Williamsburg, they come to celebrate their nation’s history, to learn about the ways of the past and to experience firsthand the ideals and idealism of the Founding Fathers. They come to try on hoopskirts and three-cornered hats; to make their own candles and to take carriage rides down Duke of Gloucester Street. They come, in short, to have a good time.
Yet the story of Colonial Williamsburg is not entirely pleasant. While remembered for asserting the fundamental rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, colonial America was also a place of inequality, oppression and disenfranchisement. For Richard Handler, professor of anthropology and associate dean for undergraduate academic programs in the College of Arts & Sciences, Williamsburg was begging to be reexamined.
In 1989, Handler, alongside anthropologist Eric Gable, a PhD in Anthropology from the class of 1990, embarked on a major study of Colonial Williamsburg. They began their research guided by one overarching question: “How do you tell the story of the American revolution in a way that honors the founding fathers while still telling the story of slavery?
Although it was a complicated pursuit, Colonial Williamsburg seemed the perfect site for exploring this dispute. Handler said, “In history as a discipline, and academia generally, there’s been an ongoing argument about whether history is objective or relative. Different historians tell different stories about the same events; professional historians know that the facts are only the beginning. At a museum, this debate takes on a funny flavor, because museums are dedicated to objects, which are seen as straightforward facts.”
With this knowledge in mind, and using grants from the Spencer Foundation and the National Endowment for the Humanities, Handler got to work. During the next three years, he, Gable, and later Anna Lawson, a PhD in anthropology from class of 1995, conducted hundreds of interviews with Colonial Williamsburg staff; examined archival documents and in-house newspapers, and toured the buildings over and over again. Gable even enrolled in a docent-training course.Handler said, “We studied how a large corporation tells history to a large audience. At places like Colonial Williamsburg, there is a complicated hierarchy of historians, managers, trainers and front-line people. We were interested in exploring not just the story they were teaching but how that story changed as it worked its way through this complicated organization.”
Their exploration yielded interesting results. First of all, they recognized a palpable awareness of the tension between education and entertainment, as Colonial Williamsburg employees repeatedly emphasized that “this is not some historical Disneyland; it’s a serious place.” They also confirmed their initial suspicions that integrating candid discussion of slavery into a celebratory context was a delicate and difficult task.
Specifically, Handler noted the challenges facing African-American employees at Colonial Williamsburg. He said, “For African-Americans who work at these sites, it’s a really tough dilemma. On one hand, they want to talk about the oppression of the system, but they also want to portray their ancestors as strong survivors. And they have to deal with the psychological challenges of dressing up as slaves.”
For the most part, Handler’s research remained focused on Colonial Williamsburg employees, as visitors turned out to be challenging sources of information. He said, “Visitors are really hard to study. It’s very hard to get good answers from them. If you ask them why they’re there, they say it’s because they love history; if you ask them how they define history, they’ll tell you ‘telling the story of our nation’s past.’ It’s difficult to get beyond that. If you’re interviewing insiders, you have a lot of specifics to talk about; with visitors, it’s a lot harder.”
Overall, Handler’s investigation of Colonial Williamsburg illuminated the challenges of merging education and entertainment, fact and revision, celebration and candor. In addition to several scholarly articles, Handler and Gable used their research to write “The New History in an Old Museum: Creating the Past at Colonial Williamsburg.” Since its publication in 1997, the book has secured its position in a unique genre — that of the museum ethnography.
You’ve been listening to the Oscar Show, I’m Jacob Canon. Join us next week when our topic will be University of Virginia psychologist Amori Yee Mikami, her research of ADHD, and how intervening factors have made this disorder more complex and detrimental for young females.