<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #88 Questions About the Water Supply Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cvillepublicmedia.org/rambler/2008/05/16/88-questions-about-the-water-supply-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cvillepublicmedia.org/rambler/2008/05/16/88-questions-about-the-water-supply-plan/</link>
	<description>stories of landscapes, conservation, and people in and beyond the Rivanna Watershed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:43:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.cvillepublicmedia.org/rambler/2008/05/16/88-questions-about-the-water-supply-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cvillepublicmedia.org/rambler/2008/05/16/88-questions-about-the-water-supply-plan/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>The plan was not approved by DEQ.  DEQ only authorized the withdrawal of water from the Rivanna River (South Fork) subject to certain limitations.  The plan is another issue entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plan was not approved by DEQ.  DEQ only authorized the withdrawal of water from the Rivanna River (South Fork) subject to certain limitations.  The plan is another issue entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard collins</title>
		<link>http://www.cvillepublicmedia.org/rambler/2008/05/16/88-questions-about-the-water-supply-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>richard collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cvillepublicmedia.org/rambler/2008/05/16/88-questions-about-the-water-supply-plan/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>I would like to compliment WTJU for the piece on the water supply planning. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve read, or heard anywhere a more succinct, yet understandable, and fair account of the choices facing Charlottesville-Albemarle on this critical choice.

I think its noteworthy that the piece was able to raise the right questions with the proper degree of skepticism about the &quot;dueling numbers&quot;. 

I would hope that City &#039;Council will not vote on whether to approve the &quot;plan&quot; until the U,S. Army Corp of Engineers has completed their evaluation and determined whether a permit can be granted for this plan or whether it must be further evaluated for its environmental and social impacts.

WTJU, you&#039;re great.

Rich Collins (former Chair RWSA 2001-2003)

Rich coll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to compliment WTJU for the piece on the water supply planning. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve read, or heard anywhere a more succinct, yet understandable, and fair account of the choices facing Charlottesville-Albemarle on this critical choice.</p>
<p>I think its noteworthy that the piece was able to raise the right questions with the proper degree of skepticism about the &#8220;dueling numbers&#8221;. </p>
<p>I would hope that City &#8216;Council will not vote on whether to approve the &#8220;plan&#8221; until the U,S. Army Corp of Engineers has completed their evaluation and determined whether a permit can be granted for this plan or whether it must be further evaluated for its environmental and social impacts.</p>
<p>WTJU, you&#8217;re great.</p>
<p>Rich Collins (former Chair RWSA 2001-2003)</p>
<p>Rich coll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
